[Quick Review] JVC HA-FX66-R Headphones

Mar 11 2008

JVC HA-FX66-R Headphones I wanted to purchase a decent set of noise canceling headphones to help block background noise while I study. After doing some research, it was evident that any real noise canceling headphones worth having were going to be over $100. That was not in my budget, so I opted to look for noise reducing headphones. Enter the JVC HA-FX66-R ear buds.

While the description says ‘noise-canceling’, the truth is that these ear buds are noise reducing. There is no active circuitry that cancels out unwanted noise. However, through good design, JVC has successfully designed a set of ear buds that effectively reduce background noise. When configured properly with the appropriately sized ear pieces, these headphones effectively reduce background noise a few DB. Where they are at their best, though, is reducing background noise while reproducing sound.

Where these headphones shine, for me, is the quality of the sound reproduction. With my entry-level Sandisk MP3 player (on the Rock EQ preset), the sound is decently balanced and is as good as could be expected given the quality of the source. On my laptop, which is equipped with a HiDef Audio controller, these headphones really shine. I wont say that they can compare with Bose, but for under $25, I am quite pleasantly surprised.

The bass is full and detailed with excellent extension into the lower registers (rated down to 10Hz). On Hip-Hop and Hard Rock, the bass pounds with authority, but on more intricate works, the bass is clean and detailed, not boomy. The midrange is full-bodied, but can be a little bit muddy on some types of music, mostly hard with heavy layers of guitar, drum and vocals. However, for most listeners, the midrange would be considered ‘warm’ and not too muddy. The highs are clean and detailed. Unlike many headphones of this type, the highs are never harsh or tinny. In fact, you really have to tinker with the EQ to get a pronounced high end out of these headphones. They stay well mannered across a wide range of music and volume. What is truly surprising is how rich their sound is at low volume.

Overall, for the money, these headphones are an excellent value. They effectively reduce background noise enabling you to listen to music at lower volumes while still enjoying your music in full detail. Dollar for dollar, you wont be disappointed with the sound reproduction of these headphones. Just don’t expect true ‘noise-canceling’ functionality out of them and you wont be disappointed.

I bought these headphones from my local CircuitCity. They were on sale for about $25 at the time. Right now, they go for about $35 and I would still gladly pay that much. Shop around to get the best deal, of course, but I’m sure you wont be sorry with these headphones.

You have read my two cents. Now have your say.
What compact “ear bud” headphones do you use?
What would you expect when you read “noise canceling”?
You get what you pay for ~OR~ Smart shopping delivers low price gems?

7 responses so far

  1. Something about the shape of my ears has made finding a pair of earbuds that fit comfortable and don’t fall out such a challenge that I hardly ever use my iPod as intended; for the past years it’s been a peripheral for speakers, a convenient way to carry around a large music library.

    I picked up a pair of FX-66 buds yesterday, and these are the most comfortable (actually, the first) earbuds to date. I like the heavier than usual cord. Even though my ability to hear high frequencies is falling off, my initial impression of sound quality was that it was very bright and bass-shy. A video on youTube provides a quick fix that involves taping a small piece of tape over the sound port, then punching a small hole in the tape using a pin. To my surprise, it works! Sound balance is about what I expect now.

  2. When I first tried the headphones on, I used the ear pieces that came with the headphones from the factory. My initial impression was exactly as you described. A bit bright and bass-shy. Then, I tried the different size ear pieces that came with the units. When I put the smallest ear pieces on, the buds fit further into my ears to where the external portion of the buds fit flush with my ear lobes. Using that ear piece made a huge difference! The highs mellowed out and there was a significant boost in the bass and midrange frequencies. No mods were required to get the desired sound quality.

    You may want to try experimenting with the different size ear pieces. You may be using a size that’s a tad too big. If you’re already on the smallest ear piece, and the solution you found is working well enough, then Great! I’ll remember that for others who have small ears.

    Thanks for sharing your experience and tips!

  3. I’m using the smallest earpieces. If I push on the buds, the bass and mid increase, but they won’t stay in that position. The YouTube hack is available at:

    http://youtube.com/watch?v=RbuSYk4FNXE&feature=related

    Rather than clear cello tape, I used some black vinyl to match the color of the buds. The nice thing about this experiment is that it’s completely reversible; if you don’t like the results, just peel off the tape.

  4. Ah, that makes sense. Thanks for sharing the tip Selden!

  5. @ThomasNewell I’m really fond of the JVC HA-FX66-R Headphones. For the money, they’re very nice when setup right. http://is.gd/f5He

  6. @ThomasNewell I’m really fond of the JVC HA-FX66-R Headphones. For the money, they’re very nice when setup right. http://is.gd/f5He

  7. I bought a set because they would appear to be excellent for sporty use. I too have been bothered by phones which just drop out onto the floor. I am no audio nerd but I have seen quality drop off with the build up of whatever it is that comes out of a cyclist’s ears sticking to a fluffy filter which is behind the rubber seal. There is no manual on the web which might suggest what to clean the fluff with.
    Need to post something to a cycling / medical site to see why the left ear is more prolific than the right.

Leave a Reply